Loading...

Eight Ways In-Vitro Meat will Change Our Lives

Written By: Hank Hyena
Date Published: November 17, 2009 | View more articles in:

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up


Subscribe to h+ RSS Feeds

"Future Flesh" is squatting on your plate. Are you nervous? Stab it with a fork. Sniff it. Bite! Chew, swallow. Congratulations! Relax and ruminate now because you're digesting a muscular invention that will massively impact the planet.

Fake meat: burgers grown in beakers. Photo credit: Will Sanders

In-Vitro Meat -- aka tank steak, sci fi sausage, petri pork, beaker bacon, Frankenburger, vat-grown veal, laboratory lamb, synthetic shmeat, trans-ham, factory filet, test tube tuna, cultured chicken, or any other moniker that can seduce the shopper's stomach -- will appear in 3-10 years as a cheaper, healthier, "greener" protein that's easily manufactured in a metropolis. Its entree will be enormous; not just food-huge like curry rippling through London in the 1970's or colonized tomatoes teaming up with pasta in early 1800's Italy. No. Bigger. In-Vitro Meat will be socially transformative, like automobiles, cinema, vaccines.

H+ previously discussed In-Vitro Meat, as have numerous other publications [see references at the end of this article]. Science pundits examined its microbiological struggles in Dutch labs and at New Harvest, a Baltimore non-profit. Squeamish reporters wasted ink on its "yucky" and "unnatural" creation, while others wondered if its "vegan" or not (PETA supports it but many members complain). This article jumps past artificial tissue issues; anticipating success, I optimistically envision Eight Ways In-Vitro Meat Will Change Our Lives.

1. Bye-Bye Ranches.
When In-Vitro Meat (IVM) is cheaper than meat-on-the-hoof-or-claw, no one will buy the undercut opponent. Slow-grown red meat & poultry will vanish from the marketplace, similar to whale oil's flame out when kerosene outshone it in the 1870's. Predictors believe that IVM will sell for half the cost of its murdered rivals. This will grind the $2 trillion global live-meat industry to a halt (500 billion pounds of meat are gobbled annually; this is expected to double by 2050). Bloody sentimentality will keep the slaughterhouses briefly busy as ranchers quick-kill their inventory before it becomes worthless, but soon Wall Street will be awash in unwanted pork bellies.

Special Note: IVM sales will be aided by continued outbreaks of filthy over-crowded farm animal diseases like swine flu, Mad Cow, avian flu, tuberculosis, brucellosis, and other animal-to-human plagues. Public hysteria will demand pre-emptive annihilation of the enormous herds and flocks where deadly pathogens form, after safe IVM protein is available.

Latex meat. Photo: slate.com

2. Urban Cowboys.
Today's gentle drift into urbanization will suddenly accelerate as unemployed livestock workers relocate and retrain for city occupations. Rural real estate values will plummet as vast tracts of ranch land are abandoned and sold for a pittance (70% of arable land in the world is currently used for livestock, 26% of the total land surface, according to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization). New use for ex-ranch land? Inexpensive vacation homes; reforested parks; fields of green products like hemp or bamboo. Hot new city job? Techies and designers for In-Vitro Meat factories.

3. Healthier Humans.
In-Vitro Meat will be 100% muscle. It will eliminate the artery-clogging saturated fat that kills us. Instead, heart-healthy Omega-3 (salmon oil) will be added. IVM will also contain no hormones, salmonella, e. coli, campylobacter, mercury, dioxin, or antibiotics that infect primitive meat. I've noted above that IVM will reduce influenza, brucellosis, TB, and Mad Cow Disease. Starvation and kwashiokor (protein deficiency) will be conquered when compact IVM kits are delivered to famine-plagued nations. The globe's water crises will be partially alleviated, due to our inheritance of the 8% of the H2O supply that was previously gulped down by livestock and their food crops. We won't even choke to death because IVM contains no malicious bones or gristle. (Although Hall of Fame slugger Jimmy Foxx choked to death on a chicken bone, about 90% of meat victims are murdered by steak).

4. Healthier Planet.
Today's meat industry is a brutal fart in the face of Gaia. A recent Worldwatch Institute report ("Livestock and Climate Change") accuses the world's 1.5 billion livestock of responsibility for 51% of all human-caused greenhouse gas emissions. Statistics are truly shitty: cattle crap 130 times more volume than a human, creating 64 million tons of sewage in the United States that's often flushed down the Mississippi River to kill fish and coral in the Gulf of Mexico. Pigs are equally putrid. There's a hog farm in Utah that oozes a bigger turd total than the entire city of Los Angeles. Livestock burps and farts are equally odious and ozone-destroying. 68% of the ammonia in the world is caused by livestock (creating acid rain), 65% of the nitrous oxide, 37% of the methane, 9% of the CO2, plus 100 other polluting gases. Big meat animals waste valuable land -- 80% of Amazon deforestation is for beef ranching, clear-cutting a Belgium-sized patch every year. Water is prodigiously gulped -- 15,000 liters of H20 produces just one kilogram of beef. 40% of the world's cereals are devoured by livestock. This scenario is clearly unsustainable, and In-Vitro Meat is the sensible alternative. (Although skeptics warn that IVM factories will produce their own emissions, research indicates that pollution will be reduced by at least 80%.) Once we get over the fact that IVM is oddly disembodied, we'll be thankful that it doesn't shit, burp, fart, eat, over graze, drink, bleed, or scream in pain.

5. Economic Upheaval.
Soy Burger. Photo credit: greenbang.comThe switch to In-Vitro Meat will pummel the finances of nations that survive on live animal industries. Many of the world leaders in massacred meat (USA, China, Brazil) have diversified incomes, but Argentina will bellow when its delicious beef is defeated. New Zealand will bleat when its lamb sales are shorn. And ocean-harvesting Vietnam and Iceland will have to fish for new vocations. Industries peripherally dependent on meat sales, like leather, dairy and wool, will also be slaughtered. Hide and leather-exporting nations like Pakistan and Kenya will be whipped, but South Korea will profit on its sales of "Koskin" and other synthetic leathers. Huge plantations of livestock crops (soybeans & corn) in Brazil, USA, Argentina, and China can be replaced with wool substitutes like sisal. Smaller nations that excel in food processing will thrive because they'll export IVM instead of importing tonnage of frozen meat. Look for economic upticks in The Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, France, and especially Japan, who's currently one of the globe's largest importers of beef.

6: Exotic & Kinky Cuisine.
In-Vitro Meat will be fashioned from any creature, not just domestics that were affordable to farm. Yes, ANY ANIMAL, even rare beasts like snow leopard, or Komodo Dragon. We will want to taste them all. Some researchers believe we will also be able to create IVM using the DNA of extinct beasts -- obviously, "DinoBurgers" will be served at every six-year-old boy's birthday party.

Humans are animals, so every hipster will try Cannibalism. Perhaps we'll just eat people we don't like, as author Iain M. Banks predicted in his short story, "The State of the Art" with diners feasting on "Stewed Idi Amin." But I imagine passionate lovers literally eating each other, growing sausages from their co-mingled tissues overnight in tabletop appliances similar to bread-making machines. And of course, masturbatory gourmands will simply gobble their own meat.

7: FarmScrapers.
The convenience of buying In-Vitro Meat fresh from the neighborhood factory will inspire urbanites to demand local vegetables and fruits. This will be accomplished with "vertical farming" -- building gigantic urban multi-level greenhouses that utilize hydroponics and interior grow-lights to create bug-free, dirt-free, quick-growing super veggies and fruit (from dwarf trees), delicious side dishes with IVM. No longer will old food arrive via long polluting transports from the hinterlands. Every metro dweller will purchase fresh meat and crispy plants within walking distance. The success of FarmScrapers will cripple rural agriculture and enhance urbanization.

Spam in a can.8. We Stop the Shame.
In-Vitro Meat will squelch the subliminal guilt that sensitive people feel when they sit down for a carnivorous meal. Forty billion animals are killed per year in the United States alone; one million chickens per hour. I list this last even though it's the top priority for vegetarians, because they represent only 1-2% of the population, but still... IVM is a huge step forward in "Abolitionism" -- the elimination of suffering in all sentient creatures. Peter Singer, founding father of Animal Liberation, supports IVM. So does every European veggie group I contacted: VEBU (Vegetarian Federation of Germany), EVA (Ethical Vegetarian Alternative of Belgium), and the Dutch Vegetarian Society. And PETA, mentioned earlier, offers $1 million to anyone who can market a competitive IVM product by 2012.

My final prediction is this: In-Vitro Meat relishes success first in Europe, partly because its "greener," but mostly they already eat "yucky" delicacies like snails, smoked eel, blood pudding, pig's head cheese, and haggis (sheep's stomach stuffed with oatmeal). In the USA, IVM will initially invade the market in Spam cans and Hot Dogs, shapes that salivating shoppers are sold on as mysterious & artificial, but edible & absolutely American.

Resources: 

Will Lab Grown Meat Save the Planet?, Slate
http://www.slate.com/id/2191705/

Fake Meat, Wired UK
http://www.wired.co.uk/wired-magazine/archive/2009/08/features/fake-meat-burgers-grown-in-beakers.aspx

The world’s addiction to meat and how to grow ground beef in a test tube, Seed
http://seedmagazine.com/content/article/why_in-vitro_meat_is_good_for_you/

Lab-Grown Steaks Near the Menu, New Sicentist
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn3208-labgrown-steaks-nearing-the-menu.html

Fight Climate Change with Soy Burgers, "In-Vitro Meat, Greenbang
http://www.greenbang.com/report-fight-climate-change-with-soy-burgers-in-vitro-meat_12300.html

I'll Have My Burger Petri-Dish Bred, with Extra Omega-3, Discover
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/oct/22-i.ll-have-my-burger-petri-dish-bred

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up

Comments

I had a friend a few years back that wanted to start a commune growing there own food and such. I thought she was some left wing nut. After reading this article I find my self thinking she wasn’t all that crazy. All this genetic tampering can’t be good. No matter if you believe in evolution or divine creation. Man is very arrogant to think he can create something better then what nature has to provide.

Anon, man has already created a whole host of things better than what nature has to provide. Nature provided winter; man provided fire and clothing and shelter. Nature provided smallpox; man provided the vaccine. Nature provided us with a brutal existence where the strong survive and the weak rot; the ingenuity of man has given us the means with which to spare the weak the hardship of nature. Primarily, it seems, so that they can damn the progress which gave them the opportunity to live as men and not as animals.

I really like the idea of artificially grown meat.

It really appeals to me when I see the huge areas of former precious native forest being cleared for farming.

Raleigh Latham is correct at what he says too - "Beef is not even natural anymore! If you look at the present system of factory farming, it's atrocious! Cattle are kept in pens so small they can't move, are pumped full of antibiotics, and eat an unnatural diet of corn while standing ankle deep in their own feces.". Most of us know how good bovine growth hormone and the antibiotics are for humans.

I have seen animal being slaughtered. I have also had to kill animals. And when you see the horror in the eyes of the animals about to be killed. Everyone who is against it should try to look into these eyes, see the blood spilling and body twitching, smell the blood and see if you can keep your juicy stake down. Only very few will manage...

Many people will be against the grown meat in the beginning, but it's inevitable. One day it will happen.

I just hope it happens soon.

And by the way, with the technology evolving it won't be necessary to use fetal bovine serum to grow it at all. Maybe some algae and/or bacteria can be used at least partially as a food source for the meat.
The quality of the product will keep getting better and better, the price will go down too.

We can write stuff until we drop here, but I am actually interested if I personally could assist in speeding up the process. Is any of you here involved with scientific or other groups working on the project? Thanks!

Hi Maria -- this is Hank, the author here -- if you want to help In-Vitro meat progress, you could contact New Harvest, a non-profit in Baltimore Maryland, and see if there's some way you could assist them. Thanks for your comments. I have had to slaughter animals as well and it was quite upsetting to me, especially killing the big kind cows.

Saturated fat is not bad for you. There may be some imbalance issues with omega 6/omega 3's, but such issues are easily resolved by including a modest amount of fish or pastured eggs in the diet.

How about the author perform an experiment on his self? Go eat only unsaturated fats, eliminate all saturated fats from your diet, and eat only lean muscle meats like chicken breast and lean beef. Do that for six months and see if your health is the same, better or worse than it was before. (My money wold be on WORSE.)

Oxidation of unsaturated fats that occurs with cooking and in the human body after consumption is a large problem with people's health today. Add to that deficiency in fat soluble vitamins like A, D, and K, (in addition to the minerals that such vitamins help the body absorb) and you have a population with weak bones, depressed immune systems, and trashed metabolisms.

http://www.westonaprice.org/

http://raypeat.com/

Hi - this is Hank Hyena, the author. I've been getting a lot of over-heated crap from you saturated fat eaters. I never said take 100% of saturated fat out of one's diet, and your suggestion that I take it all out of mine is lame. Why don't YOU just eat ONLY BACON for one hundred days and then let me know how your health is, if you're still alive? All I said was that in-vitro meat could take out saturated fat, and that would be health beneficial. There have been recent studies indicating that saturated fat has benefits, but other studies still indicate the opposite, like this:

http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20100302/HEALTH/3020337/1292/health...

The longest-lived people on the earth - Japan, Macao, Hong Kong, Andorra - are not gluttonous Cheese-Head, Hamburger-Eaters. Fish-eaters live longer than Red Meat Fat-Eaters. I don't know why you get a frenzy about the saturated fat issue, are you with the beef lobby?

"It will eliminate the artery-clogging saturated fat that kills us."

*sigh*

saturated fats dont clog arteries and are in fact good for you--there's a reason our ancestors drooled over the fattiest parts of meat and had zero incidence of heart disease. We cannot engineer healthier meats until you boneheads know what healthy really is.

It's industrial vegetable oils LOW in sat fats (think canola, corn, sunflower, safflower oil) that cause heart disease.

You want a healthy heart? have the in-vitro MIMIC real meat, and go eat some coconut oil or olive oil.

Honestly, I don't know how I should react to this. While I was reading I was laughing at it until I got to the part about farms, then I wanted to shove the author into a pile of manure. I'm not even 25 and I can tell that this is a bunch of hooey. Seriously... I don't even know where to start.

ok, from the bottom up.
Shame? I love meat, and I feel no guilt about eating it if I decide to have chicken or a steak instead of a potato. Besides, which is more wasteful, war, or a beef farm? At least everything is used in a meat farm instead of turning into worm/germ food.

I've had hydro-whatever tomatoes and they don't taste nearly as good as tomatoes grown in dirt, there's a reason that plants do best in their native environment, ie. dirt. That's what they were designed to grow in and if we think we can equal nature by using psudeo-materials, we are deluding ourselves, not to mention that I haven't seen a practical way to keep that much weight up in the air of you count the water and? the plants themselves. How on Earth could you grow enough to feed a small town, let alone a city?

Skipping #6 cause I don't see anything wrong there, though the idea of eating carnivores (normally above us on the food chain) strikes me as unnatural.

You idiot. It sounds almost trimphant, but there's a problem, things don't happen that fast. Aaaand, producing synthetic wool and leather are just as bad for the environment as the real thing, I have never heard of a plastic or synthetic material that didn't create some kind of toxic by-product. Also this shares some of the same problems as the hydroponic tomatoes, the synthetic things just dont' cut it sometimes. Wool is a miracle substance that is 1) harvested without hurting the animal 2) a work of natural engeneering that we cannot hope to beat. Keeps you warm when it's wet, it shrinks to be even more tightly wound, and it's SOFT!!

#4, um, go check your facts, I'm pretty sure that lots of the manure is used in agriculture, and the CO2 facts are--I'll be nice--inaccurate.

I am firmly in the group promoting exposure to germs. Let the kids eat dirt, builds their immune system and gives micronutrients! For gawd's sake, no fat and syntho-fish? no thank you please! No fat=No flavor and for the starvation probem we gotta get those darn beurocrats to start cooperating, and that'll be a bigger achievement than any amount of fake meat.

This one makes me laugh, with "No starvation" you're going to need to farm, because you can't grow all your food in giant glass-and-steel test tubes, no starvation means more people to feed, and they can't live off of just synthomeat. Farmland will be more important than ever, because more food is produced by plants than animals and more of anyones diet is plant-matter than meat. you might want to find a way to get those 100 acre parking lots out of the way while you're at it, they cause more problems than the cows! Oh, and the cars too.

Hi landlubber -- Hank Hyena here -- the author of this article you hate -- I just wanted to refer you to a newsarticle on "FarmScrapers" - they're going to start building them in South Korea -- here is the link:
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2009/08/123_49948.html
my prediction that ranches will end seems to make everyone angrier than anything else in the article -
but I still believe it -- I think food will be grown & manufactured in cities, the plants will need syscrapers, the
meat just needs good in-vitro factories. It is nice that you like wool but gosh, it is a lot of work to grow wool on a sheep and shear it and clean it - same with leather - I think they'll both disappear. Thanks for reading my article though

Also: please, when throwing huge generalisations about farming around, be aware the US beef factory-farming practices are not standard operating procedure all over the world.

It may be a lot of work to "grow wool on a sheep and shear it and clean it" -- but it's an annual crop.
Wool was the reason for New Zealand's massive sheep flock; sheep-meat was a by-product of growing wool. I say "was" because the New Zealand sheep flock is rapidly vanishing, the collapse in the price of wool being one of the reasons.

Looks like the first bit of test tube meat has been produced. Tongue in cheek. Either that or this laughable article was written by someone with some stunning delusions.

I wanna taste some pikachu!

A bit of a tree hugging hippy article (why should we feel shame when eating animals, hundreds of millions of years of evolution and survival tells me meat is good).
BUT it is very interesting and I'm gonna predict the opposite... I don't think "real" meat will become a thing of the past... I think it will become a premium and the price will skyrocket
Also this could be the end of the world as we know it. No more starvation means massive overcrowding and overpopullation. All that leads to more pollution and all that previous farming land will turn into a great location to settle all the billions of Africans who still like to have 38 children each even though they all survive now.
Having said that looking forward to trying out alot of new meats

"68% of the ammonia in the world is caused by livestock (creating acid rain)"

You are an absolute moron

You are the Moron with a capital M. Livestock have been around a long time just because they make up baloney about them changing the weather now fools like you believe it.

Putting farmers out of business.... don't you think with the times we are in that will just make things worse? I don't agree with the way some animals are raised( I used to work in chicken houses and won't ever go back in one now) but their is nothing better than a big porter house or smothered chicken.

To make a long story short fuck you for posting this, fuck PETA, and fuck anyone that would even consider eating this garbage.

This one is @Hanky boy... Thumbs up for you for writing this article then posting this reply even though it is against you.

This article is completely wrong wrt saturated fat. It's not the fat that kills us; it's the carbs.

Until in vitro meat also includes fat, it will never become popular. Remember, folks: "fat free" means "flavor free".

carbs don't clog our arteries, but saturated fats do.

Too many carbs and our bodies stop breaking down those fats for energy. Hence too much carbs clogs arteries. Lots of saturated fats and low carbs means your body will process the fats in your body for energy. High fat low carb diet = body burns more fat and gets leaner and healthier.

While the author makes some interesting points, there are so many assumptions with this article that may or may not be true that any kind of thinking person might assume that the writer is totally one sided.

Could we have some research please so that we can deal with facts, not wishes!

There may be a lot of truth in the article, but very little has been actually experienced.

For now, I'll stick to McDonalds - at least once in a while ...

The problem I have with this is that it relies too much on technology that would be inaccessible to the poor. It's bad enough to GM crops are patented and that we must buy new seeds every year for plants that require fertilizer and weed killer... all provided by the same company.

If you control the food, you control the people.

I would rather be a vegetarian than eat lab-grown meat. I do not support lab grown meat at all.

I do support GM plants... but only if the laws regarding them can be made reasonable. In other words, if we are allowed to keep seeds and are not prosecuted for making hybrids or even doing research to determine their effectiveness and/or healthiness.

Imagine that instead of meat being grown in a laboratory, or in some special piece of equipment, it is grown on a tree in your front yard. It looks like a grapefruit, but when peeled, you find slices of meat, pre-marinated with citric juices. Not only that, but it could be engineered to proved a full protein profile and have every part of the plant edible. The leaves could be used as a green. The fruit is a meat. The seeds can be ground into flower. The possibilities are endless.

Okay, what side of the magic carpet did you wake up on?! Not only does the prospect of a meat grapefruit sound repulsive, but it's completely half baked. We're talking about things within in the realm of scientific possibility, not something you thought up while you had the munchies. You're right about seeds, it's ridiculous what Monsanto is doing, but not as ridiculous as your meat trees from crazy town.

that's really closed minded of you and you probably don't realize where science is going or can go which dumbfounds me cuz you just read an article about growing food in a lab....you control electrons you can do anything

"what side of the magic carpet did you wake up on?! Not only does the prospect of a meat grapefruit sound repulsive, but it's completely half baked. We're talking about things within in the realm of scientific possibility, not something you thought up while you had the munchies."

Why?

I definitely see vegetables with savory meat-like flavor and complete protein content equal to that of beef (which some plants, including Spirulina algae, already possess!) in our future, this century.

Peach Steak Fruit. I had great stake with peach sauce once. Now I'm hungry.

*blink blink blink*

Okay... let me get this straight.

You absolutely refuse to eat meat that is genetically identical to beef, because it's made by a company

But want a genetically engineered biological chimera meat producing plant that produces a beef citrus hybrid that may taste like beef marinated in citrus juice but has ABSOLUTELY NO GENETIC SIMULARITY to beef... which would have to be designed by a laboratory, prototyped, tested, perfected, and then finally sold to you to plant in your front yard so that YOU DON'T HAVE TO RELY ON A COMPANY TO PROVIDE FOOD???

@.@

Did you really think this one through?

Still, don't worry. The technology for home fabrication of everything is coming. You'll be able to have it print out a seed for you to grow, and provide you with plenty of other food while you're waiting for those "fruits" to ripen.

I'm just that little bit scared that what goes into this meat will be a reflection of all the other rubbish products that get hurled at us - carcinogens, for example. Its those nasty little numbers on the back of the product that will tell whether this is the miracle of the century or the long term health nemesis of humanity.

I simply don't trust governments and people to do the right thing with our food anymore in a globalised economy. Its something they are going to have to work on with consumers.

But after that's all said and done - wow! WOW! That close.

Hey. I am doing a research about the disadvantages of IVM and all I was able to find out was that it can harm some economies and that it is unnatural. About the economies, I think that economies change all the time so its not a big problem. Are there any "real" disadvantages?? And could the system be really abused into making genetically modified in vitro meat??

Thank you

Any system can be abused. Period. There are no abuse proof technologies.

That said the possibility of "genetically modified" IVM depends on your definitions of modification I suppose.

Cross gene splicing of various cattle breeds to make "perfect beef" is a very real possibility since we already breed cattle to produce different strains with specific traits.

Genetic modification to enhance various properties is almost certain. but I would strongly suspect that such modifications would be labeled due to regulations.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.