Loading...

Wake from Cryonics

Wealthy from Your Own Life Insurance. You can too take it with you – and enjoy it when you get back
Written By: Stephen Euin Cobb
Date Published: September 16, 2009 | View more articles in:

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up


Subscribe to h+ RSS Feeds

The laws are complicated, and not stacked in your favor, but if done carefully it’s possible to leave a huge death benefit payoff from your life insurance policy to your cryonically-preserved self. And since life insurance can also be used to finance your cryopreservation, you need not wait until you are rich to sign up. Most in the middle class, if they seriously want it, can afford it now. So by taking the right steps, you can look forward to waking up one bright future morning from cryopreservation the proud owner of a bank account brimming with money.

Don’t get me wrong. Leaving money to your future self is complicated. The courts have decided that cryopreserved people are not suspended or preserved. Rather, they are irrevocably dead, and by being dead have no legal right of ownership or inheritance. These laws may change if the first cryopreserved people are resuscitated and sue for some new kind of civil rights, but that could be decades away. In the meantime, those who are not yet being preserved have spent years pondering and discussing possible methods of self-inheritance. They call it Cryonics Estate Planning and there are now at least three ways to achieve the goal.

One method requires individuals to join a foundation based in Europe that has no website and generally avoids publicity (like the piece you are reading now). It was created by wealthy cryonicists for the purpose of wealth preservation, as well as to fund both their cryopreservation and their eventual resuscitation. Meanwhile, Alcor — a more inclusive organization and one of the two main cryopreservation facilities in the United States — is in the process of developing a trust. And finally — for the use of his clients — Rudi Hoffman has created a trust.

Wake from CryonicsHaving written cryopreservation insurance policies for nearly a thousand people, Rudi Hoffman is well established as the world’s leading cryonics insurance provider. As a certified financial planner, he also has a longstanding record of helping people leave money to their future selves, and thus avoid the worry of being revived from cryopreservation to discover that they are penniless in wonderland.

A cryonics activist, volunteer, speaker and writer, Rudi teaches cryonic preservation to the uninitiated. “I signed up for cryopreservation back in 1994,” he said, “But being a transhumanist, it’s my hope that medical science will advance fast enough and soon enough that I never need to be cryopreserved. I look at cryonics itself as a form of insurance. If I need it, I’ve got it. It’s always good to have a backup plan.”

“The Hoffman Prototype Cryonics Trust,” he explained, “is a method of sidestepping the problem that cryopreserved people have no legal rights by using a dynasty trust.” Dynasty trusts have been used for a century or more in estate planning to make sure future inheritances are awarded only to specific people under specific circumstances — such as paying the tuition of a grandchild when they go to college but only if they maintain a B average. This separates the money from personal ownership, and yet allows the money to be awarded to the cryopreserved person after they are resuscitated.

“I just emailed a student graduating from high school who is signing up for cryonics,” Rudi said. “This points up the egalitarian nature of cryonics; and how the leverage of life insurance can mean a kid with minimal resources can fund both his suspension and a cryonics trust for under a dollar a day.” (Age, health, lifestyle choices like smoking, as well as the size of the desired death benefit payoff cause rates to vary widely from one person to the next.)

Do You Need Money in the Future?
Money, some insist, will have no meaning in a future dominated by advanced molecular manufacturing or other engines of mega-abundance. In this case waking from cryonics rich or poor would be exactly the same.

The courts have decided that cryopreserved people are not suspended or preserved... they are irrevocably dead and have no legal right of ownership or inheritance.

Ben Goertzel, Director of Research at SIAI, and CEO of Novamente LLC and Biomind LLC — both of which produce AI products for corporate clients — described it this way: “Most probably there will always be some issues regarding resource limitations, even in post-Singularity societies. But the reality we take for granted now, in which an individual needs to expend significant effort to acquire the resources to fulfill his basic physical, emotional or intellectual needs, is unlikely to survive after the invention of molecular nanotech, virtual reality and other advanced methods.”

He added, “What seems most likely, if the future takes a positive path in which advanced tech is used in a generally benevolent way, is that a huge and rich variety of resources will be available for all sentient beings ... and negotiation for those resources that are still scarce will occur according to methods much more sophisticated than our current ‘money economy’; methods which we have no current means to predict or understand.”

While Rudi Hoffman is aware that advanced nanotechnologies may well produce a post-scarcity era of unlimited bounty for all — and is eager for such a day — he also knows that the cryonically preserved have no guarantee of waking into such a world. “Having a personal abundance of money,” he said, “will preserve your options. And creating a pleasant and fulfilling future for yourself and those you treasure is all about choosing the best options.”

Stephen Euin Cobb is an author, columnist, futurist, game designer, artist, transhumanist and host of the award-winning podcast about the future called: The Future and You.

 

Resources: 

Rudi Hoffman
www.rudihoffman.com

Alcor
www.alcor.org

The Cryonics Institute
http://www.cryonics.org/

Ben Goertzel
www.goertzel.org

Digital edition View the Digital EditionSign Up

Comments

May I suggest you start reading some of Larry Niven's science fiction on 'corpsicles' like 'ARM', 'The defenseless dead', 'The Jigsaw Man', 'The Patchwork Girl' and 'The Long ARM of Gil Hamilton' (collection). Many interesting aspects discussed. And yes, beware, what is true and/or lawfull today, maybe different tomorrow (or after).

Keep smiling

Perhaps some kind of guardianship will evolve for the cryonically preserved. After all, someone may have to make some decisions about the money being put aside. And may it not be necessary to determine whether someone is revivable or not? What if your "will" says to bring you back after 200 years and when those years go by, the experts don't think it would be safe yet? Imagine the liability if they tried and failed. The only safe bet is that legal fees will be paid one way or the other!

My compliments, you have just recreated a scenario depicted in the following film: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0072690/, which I highly recommend for watching by eager cryocitizens.

rick,

No one has been revived yet because severe frostbite and advanced aging are difficult problems that no one has figured out how to reverse. It would be irresponsible to try now, given the current primitive state of technology.

However, that doesn't mean that we _won't_ be able to revive the people currently frozen. We're rapidly understanding how the brain works, and developing tools to repair and enhance our bodies at the molecular levels. Once we have the knowledge, then it would make sense to attempt to revive them.

You statement makes nosense, the only irresponsible choice is to choose an ordinary burial or a cremation, when you know that FOR SURE you won't be revived, EVER, Cryonics may not work of course, but is the only rational choice with the odds of working in a foreseeble future. 10 years ago, people thought that nanobots (one of the technologies in which cryonics my rely) were sci-fi and never would be possible to build a machine at a nano-scale, now this is a fact, and nobody can't deny it, step by step we will get there... It may not work, but is the only rational choice.

The problem is, the reason that we can't unthaw them is that the error is with the freezing process as well as the unthawing process.

As water freezes, it expands. Inside of your cells, the water inside them cause the cells to rupture. This is called cytolysis. This is responsible for "frost bite" that you can lose limbs to.

Then, once you are frozen, you have to heat the subject quickly enough that the cells are not ruptures, in addition to heating the body without cooking it, and without leaving frozen spots.

Then, you have a body that is still dead. Although if you manage to prevent tissue damage, even at the cellular level, there is a good chance to revive as the freezing process instantly stopped all metabolic processes.

So, it is very likely that people who are frozen now with today's technology will NEVER be unfrozen, because cytolysis has already occurred. Well, maybe when technology is StarTrek good, like TNG, then maybe. But until then, don't count on it.

However, if you wait a couple of decades, we might figure out how to bypass cytolysis. There is a fish in the arctic that survives in below freezing water because of an enzyme. This enzyme might help to fight cytolysis. It's already being used to make light ice cream taste more like regular.

But then, none of our heating technologies can bring each and every cell up to body temperature with perfect uniformity without going over or having large ranges in temperature differentials, resulting in both cooking and frozen bits.

Mmm... Soylent Green. Just kidding folks.

So, while having Cryogenic Insurance could be a sweet deal, I'd hold off on the Cryogenics. Wait until they perfect both the freezing and thawing process. Demonstrate workable products. Then, go for it.

After all, it might happen that some of our first missions to other solar systems might be aided by cryogenics. And by the time the first couple of waves of ships arrive in Alpha Centauri or wherever, we would have already developed the technology to get there in a fraction of the time.

I think you're missing the point. If you wait until the freezing and thawing process is perfected you won't need it any more. Once we have that level of technology you won't die in the first place. Today's cryonics is not what might some day be used for space travel, it's a last chance way of maybe prolonging life when you're dying anyway.

As far as people frozen today, the type of damage you talk about will likely be reversible with nanotechnology. The type of damage that might matter is loss of information in the brain that would cause memory loss, personality change, etc. I don't think it's currently known how likely that is. But as I said before, if you do die, cryonics gives you a slight chance of revival. Without it, you have no chance at all...you're just worm food.

http://alcor.org/FAQs/index.html

No one should consider cryonics before listening to the episode on This American Life http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx?episode=354

All of that money is just going to end up in the hands of those people who are willing to let you believe the process will work. Ask yourself, "Why have they never managed to actually thaw anyone?"

No one has been thawed because the technology to do so doesn't exist yet. It probably will in a few decades with nanotechnology and better medical science. Not only that, there's no point in reviving someone until whatever killed them in the first place can be cured...also probably several decades away.

The deal with cryonics is it gives you a slight chance of an extended life. Without it your chances are zero.

I don't know much about this field, but was wondering the following.

If someone is in cryonics, then arguably they are not yet "dead." If it works, then they certainly are not dead since they will be "unfrozen."

Does that mean someone could be in "frozen" for 100 years and collect social security and wake-up one day?!

If people are revived, then do they have to pay the life insurance company back? Or, would they be treated as having been "dead" so all is good.

I am a lawyer, so I think if I have some time it would be fun to research and think about this and write something-up exploring the interesting issues raised.

p.s. Good luck to all who try this!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.