This must be a prank.
The Wall Street Journal today reports on a couple of "immortalists" whose dreams of living forever were wrecked by Best Scammer Ever Bernard Madoff.
The article contains nary a mention of the words medicine, biotechnology... or even vitamin or nutrient. The couple, according to WSJ, were going to attain immortality by living in an uncomfortable house (must be a lot of secret immortals out there, particularly in the world's most impoverished places).
Quoth WSJ
"The pair's work, based loosely on a movement known as "transhumanism," is premised on the idea that people degenerate and die in part because they live in spaces that are too comfortable. The artists' solution: construct abodes that leave people disoriented, challenged and feeling anything but comfortable.
"They build buildings with no doors inside. They place rooms far apart. They put windows near the ceiling or near the floor. Between rooms are sloping, bumpy moonscape-like floors designed to throw occupants off balance. These features, they argue, stimulate the body and mind, thus prolonging life. 'You become like a baby,' says Mr. Arakawa...
"A typical apartment has three or four rooms in the shapes of either a cylinder, a cube, or a sphere. Rooms surround a kitchen-living room combination with bumpy, undulating floors and floor-to-ceiling ladders and poles. Dozens of colors, from school-bus yellow to sky blue, cover the walls, ceilings and other surfaces.
At least one tenant says he feels a little younger already. Nobutaka Yamaoka, who moved in with his wife and two children about two years ago, says he has lost more than 20 pounds and no longer suffers from hay fever, though he isn't sure whether it was cured by the loft."
I myself have been convinced of my immortality while staring at undulating floors. But then I slept it off...
The couple -- Arakawa and Madeline Gins -- are fairly well-known conceptual artists. Alexandra Munroe of the Guggenheim is quoted as saying that "many of their supporters don't literally accept the couple's message on immortality but appreciate it in a 'metaphorical' way."
Indeed.
This is conceptual art folks, not someone's actual dream of immortality. The WSJ simply did a poor job of framing the story.
Or maybe they were in on the prank.
Read and comment on blog posts from h+ editor RU Sirius and others.
It seems like the DHA didn't have any effect. The trend was already towards shorter times and the rate doesn't appear to change substantially...
This will be the beginning of the end for tech.
First I would point out that most perceive the levels of transcendence or evolution as happening very rapid and with out the other complexities it...
First off for the poster who thinks clothing is far away, look at lumalive...
Comments
"The artists' solution:
"The artists' solution: construct abodes that leave people disoriented, challenged and feeling anything but comfortable."
Huh.. it makes some kind of distorted sense. The more challenges your brain faces the better, but i dunno about making your existence awkward and uncomfortable. Sometimes artist types have too much free time to think about weird things.. lol
latex mattress | Kate
s at least decent .. seems
s at least decent .. seems more of a means by which to inject the transhumanist meme into circulation ... the madoff stuff seems like an afterthought.
mpcoc
I think the buildings are
I think the buildings are pretty fun and interesting actually. The assertion about uncomfortable buildings making people immortal is not really a great construct, even as conceptual art imho.
Just a bit of fluff
The goofiest thing about the WSJ article were the quotes solicited from the aging researcher and Ray Kurzweil. Did the reporter really expect his readers to be confused about whether these houses really allow people to live forever?
As to the work itself, bear in mind that straight-faced proclamations of the ridiculous like those made by the artists are common enough in conceptual art and architecture. It's just a trope of art criticism, particularly when artists talk about their own work.
Personally, I think their work is genuinely provocative. Bearing in mind that this is art and disregarding their (presumably ironic) claim to an anti-aging technology, the concepts Arakawa and Gin express are validly transhumanist. In particular, their work is a rejection of the idea that aging should be passively accepted. The struggle with environment that inhabitants of their tricky apartments face echoes the notion of humanity itself refusing to accept givens such as the inevitability of aging.
Whether they have to build entire apartment buildings to make their point is probably the more valid point of debate.
unfair characterization
Calling Arakawa and Gins "wack" is not very fair.
I think the notions advanced by Arakawa in his design efforts hold substantial weight.
The title of this post may strike some as amateurish and rude.
the article
is at least decent .. seems more of a means by which to inject the transhumanist meme into circulation ... the madoff stuff seems like an afterthought.
I Agree . . .
Way to control the language WSJ. Not to say that artistic language is not part of any
real "reporter's" job. But it's fun to control perception among your
educated readers by competing with FOX News.
Good headline.
The reality is, transhumanism is about using technology to improve lives. It's not
about a limited philosophy dedicated to strict mysterious architectural caging.
WTF.
Anyhow, here's a blog entry from the joke story I thought funny:
"#8 POSTED BY NANUQ , MARCH 24, 2009 6:51 PM
"people degenerate and die in part because they live in spaces that are too comfortable."
I'd say there are any number of people living on heating grates and in alleyways who must be downright immortal then."
Post new comment